Along a side street Somewhere: In search of an anonymous suburb

2012-02-10_1328870298_8286417623_o

I recently went in search for an ‘anonymous suburb’. It is one of those hackneyed terms that makes a kind of sense in print – we probably all have an idea of what an ‘anonymous suburb’ is, yet – I suspect – in practise, on the ground, doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. So I went to take a look.

Here are two examples from a random online search:

This from a piece on a wine critic in The Scotsman: “Cut to 2003 and West Norwood, an anonymous London suburb where a young, unassuming wine buyer for Japan Airlines began a wine blog…”

Or here in The New York Times: “But where once there was only one Ferguson — an anonymous suburb of St. Louis — now there is another: a small city whose name has become known for civil unrest, racial division and police harassment.”

I don’t always pause to think about the term, but when I do, there’s something about it that irks me. Irks me in the same way way that National news correspondents do if they talk about ‘The North’ – as if such a homogenous, generic region actually exists, somewhere up there, above the places that actually matter.

There’s something lazy and mean about the use of ‘anonymous’ alongside suburb – it’s an unnecessary adjective that serves as a petty gibe at a place the writer is probably unfamiliar with; a handy journalistic cliché to reach for on route to the apparent meat of the story.

In The York Times piece, the phrase is also freighted with the implication that before riot and protest and violence, Ferguson simply didn’t matter.

By its very nature, writing about place and landscape – whether urban, rural or spaces in between – centres on details, on landmarks, looking into those things that mark a particular location out – the sights, sounds, atmospheres, buildings, plants, animals and  people that make one place distinct from another.

Is it possible, though, to do the opposite? To locate an absence, or go looking for places that are indistinguishable from anywhere else? Recently, inspired, or rather, provoked by another instance of ‘anonymous suburb’, I set out in search of such a place – a kind of anti-destination. I wanted to see if I could find some real-world anonymous streets, places without focus, spatial blurs devoid of interest. Handily I live in West Norwood, so figured I might not have too far to go.

I set off, quickly heading away from Norwood Road, the local high street, which would be no use in this context, being too full of specific shops, like the Electric Café, where Stav the owner might talk to you and say something interesting.

No, this quest called for side streets, the blander the better, with long stretches of unremarkable housing, preferably uninspiring blocks of 1960s or 70s flats, although row upon row of pebble-dashed semis, or Tudorbethan homes and some average looking Victorian terraces would do.

Surely there must be a place where these could be found; all merging into one another in their utter ordinariness?

I headed up York Hill, where at the bottom, rows of squat, square brown brick houses run along one side of the road, opposite the York Hill Estate – with its blocks of red brick Lambeth social housing – the uniform colour broken by white painted balconied walkways running along three floors of one of the buildings. Facing ‘Chapman House’ (damn, a name) stood a heavily pollarded London Plane– the acme of generic urban trees. Next to this on one of the brown brick buildings a yellow burglar alarm had a pattern of lighter, smaller plastic shapes placed around it, making it look like a blocky-daisy, or plastic sun.

This had seemed promising, but the harder I looked for the commonplace and the ordinary, the more detail and variety I noticed. I carried on up, over a functional brick built bridge over the railway. Houses now started to take on the standard suburban mix – a few drives with cars in them – a couple of Ford Focuses, so qualifying as pretty average in that respect. Maybe this could be that stereotypical un-place. Others still had front gardens with hydrangeas, hedges – some of privet – but also roses, grasses, even a tall palm tree.

Then there were the doors, windows (with and without twitching curtains) and other architectural features – most of them subtly different. Here were towers, Gothic revival motifs, Lions on gate lintels, shakily painted house numbers on bins, 1930s sunburst patterns on glass windows, this was no good at all…

I found myself walking in circles around Royal Circus at the top of the hill, wondering which branching arm of a street to take next; each stretching off and away, filled with house after house after house from this backstreet hub.

As I looked I couldn’t help but think of songs and books and poems that I associate with city life. Soft Cell’s Bedsitland with its living and loving behind closed doors, along countless marching roads of flats and homes. Echoes of Eliot’s Preludes, with thousands of hands, pulling at thousands of dingy shutters. Or Shara Nelson on Massive Attacks’ Safe From Harm singing of ‘lucky dippers, crazy chancers’ – at once a yearning for escape and a nostalgia for a particular place and time, all wrapped up in a vision of a pulsing, moody urban world, that’s both enticing and threatening.

In reflecting on such things when I walk and sharing them here, I am conscious that I am engaging in what writers or critics sometimes call ‘re-enchantment’ – infusing a place with literary and artistic associations to give it a significance or meaning it doesn’t inherently possess.

But I don’t think these surburban West Norwood Streets – Royal Circus, Knollys Road, Canterbury Grove, Glennie Road, York Hill etc, or any streets elsewhere need any self-conscious ‘re-enchantment’ to not be anonymous – there’s enough here, or there, in the small, everyday details to set them apart or spark interest without layering on history or poetry.

Just open your eyes on a walk down an ‘ordinary’ road and architectural or other details like those mentioned above will mark it out. Perhaps there’s a tall, ivy covered Horse Chestnut tree looming on a corner, a hopscotch game marked in chalk, trainers hanging from bare branches – suggesting a nearby drug dealer maybe, a pair of more modern houses amidst a row of Victorian ones – which might mean the originals were bombed in the Blitz, or may signify something else entirely.

I sometimes wonder why sparrows can be found chattering on one roof and not another, or at other times feel struck by their complete absence. Or I’ll saunter along and clock a crow, gull or magpie on a chimney and ask why it picked this one and not that. Other suburban signs of interest to look for can include rows of houses with names as well as numbers – not always the stereotypical suburban Dunromin either – but also Laureates and Beauclairs, or place names from somewhere else with titles like Something View. Who decided on these names and why?

Who lives in that dilapidated house, with the tatty net curtains, window always open, next to the trim and tidy one next door? Why do they both have lunette windows? What goes on in there? Start pondering on the insides; the shelves and what’s on them, or what isn’t, the photos on the walls, the basement kitchens with hands in the sinks…and the idle daydreaming possibilities are endless.

I like ambling along city side streets, always have. There’s something at once reassuring, yet also tantalising, about being faced with a long and winding street. An immanence can be felt sometimes – that sense that anything could happen, you could go anywhere along here and adventure might ensue.

All those lives, all those emotions behind closed doors – loving, fighting, arguing, preparing for work, rolling over without work to go to, affairs beginning, ending, children growing, learning, packing up and leaving, or just arriving.

To me, in unfashionable Freudian terms, side streets are the Id to the city centre’s Ego. The private, the internal subconscious of a city, where the real desires and machinations of its citizens take place, away from the visible, public arena of the high street.

So is there such a thing as an ‘anonymous suburb’? Maybe in London, as crazy prices and unimaginative developments continue the blanding of the city. Maybe as more and more areas become unaffordable to more of the people, and greater swathes of it become less of a mix of lives and classes, with those remaining dreaming the same dreams and thinking the same thoughts, perhaps then some kind of amorphous, increasingly vanilla, hollowed out urban landscape will have been created.

But I’m not sure that will happen – walk the streets of Sheffield, or Glasgow, or Bristol, Coventry, Lambeth, or Harringey today, go anywhere with open eyes and ears and I feel certain you won’t be able to locate an ‘anonymous suburb’.

For now I am happy to conclude that one day I set out on a walk to nowhere in particular, but couldn’t find it.

 

 

5 thoughts on “Along a side street Somewhere: In search of an anonymous suburb

  1. Agree with much of this article. Personally I do prefer living in the middle of the city and have done so for most of my life, but this is more because no-one in my family can drive a car which does affect your choices! But would be just as happy living in the suburbs as anywhere else.

    However, I never could understand the idle and dismissive snobbery about the suburbs when it is a national repository for so much of our imagination, open spaces, museums, culture and heritage (Bowie and Ballard instantly spring to mind, so do a lot of weird and wonderful sights I’ve seen in London and Glasgow suburbs). There can be anonymous or soulless streets and areas in any part of a city, be that central, inner city or suburb.

    Behind any facades extraordinary things can be happening but you are right to avoid the problem of ‘re-enchantment’, and this post does a good job of allowing the wonder of West Norwood to speak for itself.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi Alex I know what you mean about living in the centre of things – I suppose I’m doing a classic getting older and moving further out – though as the ‘burbs go WN is still fairly urban in character in many parts.

      It’s a difficult one the ‘re-enchantment’ thing. I read a nicely put defence by the writer Sharon Blackie recently (of Earthlines etc) https://singingoverthebones.org/2016/03/22/why-enchantment-matters/

      And what’s the problem with finding or looking for the magical in the everyday or the extraordinary in the ordinary?

      And yet I find there is an element sometimes, in some writing, of ‘here’s a quote’ (or a reference to someone of significance who once lived somewhere) ‘Now you’ll find it interesting’ about places that perhaps are not inherently significant or interesting. There’s a kind of artificial layering on of ‘meaning’ that either ends up sounding a bit twee and over-Romanticises places that are actually a bit dull, or shit, or gets heavily academic in a showing-off way: ‘to mere mortals this may seem an average garage door, but to the enlightened, it’s a liminal frontier on the intersection between the Ballardian public arena of the highway and the privatised domestic interior life…”

      But I do like a good quote, or relevant mention of artists, writers, thinkers etc who have written about place in general or specifically if it helps illuminate a book, article etc. I certainly make reference to others in some of my posts on here- though I try to do it lightly, in a way that adds an angle or different perspective, rather than because I haven’t got anything worthwhile to add myself (though I would say that of course)

      I suppose its a question of balance. As for West Norwood in particular, let’s just say it isn’t as easy to find cultural references to it as it might be for Dalston.

      Like

      • I enjoyed that in defence of enchantment article. I was also highly amused by your ‘to mere mortals this may seem an average garage door,…’ point! Very true. I shall never look at garage doors in the same way. As for a lack of cultural references – it’s a blank space for you to start filling!

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: Madness and Melancholy | dianajhale

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s